Databases
StackOverflow2013
Postsdbo
POWhat C# features would be removed if backwards compatibility were not an issue?
 

Note that there are some explanatory texts on larger screens.

plurals
  1. POWhat C# features would be removed if backwards compatibility were not an issue?
    primarykey
    data
    text
    singulars
    1. PO
      singulars
      1. PTAnswer
    1. This table or related slice is empty.
    1. PTQuestion
    1. USJeremy Roberts
    1. USctford
    plurals
    1. This table or related slice is empty.
    1. This table or related slice is empty.
    1. This table or related slice is empty.
    1. PO
      singulars
      1. PTAnswer
    2. PO
      singulars
      1. PTAnswer
    3. PO
      singulars
      1. PTAnswer
    1. VO
      singulars
      1. POWhat C# features would be removed if backwards compatibility were not an issue?
      1. This table or related slice is empty.
      1. VTUpMod
    2. VO
      singulars
      1. POWhat C# features would be removed if backwards compatibility were not an issue?
      1. This table or related slice is empty.
      1. VTUpMod
    3. VO
      singulars
      1. POWhat C# features would be removed if backwards compatibility were not an issue?
      1. This table or related slice is empty.
      1. VTUpMod
    1. COHow about GOTO? As in GOTO "subjective and argumentative"?
      singulars
      1. POWhat C# features would be removed if backwards compatibility were not an issue?
      1. USMatthew Jones
    2. COIs there any way I could refine the question that would satisfy those people who want it closed? I realise that what language features each developer likes is subjective, but I think there are some things that are almost universally regarded as bad.
      singulars
      1. POWhat C# features would be removed if backwards compatibility were not an issue?
      1. USctford
    3. COI'm not sure what the point of it is besides a "debate", vote to close subjective and argumentative.
      singulars
      1. POWhat C# features would be removed if backwards compatibility were not an issue?
      1. USuser7116
 

Querying!

 
Guidance
A row detail

Detail views are divided into sections. All the information in the data section comes from columns in the selected row. The other sections display data from other, related rows.

Related data can be related in a to-one or a to-many fashion. Captions of data related in a to-many fashion link to a list view showing a filtered view of the table.

Try moving around until you find a non-empty to-many entry and click on the label to get to one. You can move back to the root by clicking on the database name in the header.

SQuiL has stopped working due to an internal error.

If you are curious you may find further information in the browser console, which is accessible through the devtools (F12).

Reload