StackOverflow2013

Note that there are some explanatory texts on larger screens.

plurals

PO
primarykey
Id
16440964
data
AcceptedAnswerId
0
AnswerCount
0
ClosedDate
CommentCount
0
CommunityOwnedDate
2014-05-30T20:56:27.847
CreationDate
2013-05-08T12:40:20.783
FavoriteCount
0
LastActivityDate
2014-05-30T20:56:27.847
LastEditDate
2014-05-30T20:56:27.847
LastEditorUserId
287948
OwnerUserId
287948
ParentId
14573391
PostTypeId
2
Score
1
ViewCount
0
LastEditorDisplayName
text
Body
<h2>A solution by batch processing (a lot of articles)</h2> ... The only way that I can use today (2013) is this (semi-automatic) procedure: <ol> <li>[manual, prepare] Check my InDesign "template" file, that will be used as "importer": styles with legible names must by defined. They are all visible (listed) in a HTML+CSS exporting.</li> <li>[manual, prepare] Adapt a XSLT to convert convert your XML files to XHTML ones, expressing all relevant styles with the attribute class and consistent (with item 1) class names;</li> <li>[automatic, batch processing] Convert automatically all XML to XHTML by the XSLT; </li> <li>[automatic, batch processing] Convert automatically all XHTML files to DOC, using <a href="https://github.com/mirkonasato/pyodconverter" rel="nofollow">Python OpenDocument Converter</a>.</li> <li>[InDesign assisted, final processing] Import each DOC from a "template" (item 1) file clone at InDesign. The classes (item 2) will be automatically transformed by InDesign styles.</li> </ol> This procedure is better than IDML because use directaly the XHTML as content source for InDesign. It is not perfect for all applications, but avoids use of non-standard conversion by IDML, avoid to learn IDML, avoid IDML limitations, and avoids risks of IDML bugs... So, I think is faster than try and try IDML procedures. <hr> Another procedure — better, because it allows to express things like footnotes — is to prepare a direct convertion from XML to MS-Word, by a XSLT that transforms XML into <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Office_Open_XML" rel="nofollow">DOCX</a> or <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rich_Text_Format" rel="nofollow">RFT</a>... Do you have a link or clue for this kind of procedure? <hr> MANIFEST Adobe products are "closed" for universal standards (!) importation, like to import <a href="http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/" rel="nofollow">XHTML</a>. How to PROTEST against Adobe?! The biggest problem arises when we have many files...
Tags
Title
singulars
PostAcceptedAnswerId
1. This table or related slice is empty.
PostParentId
1. POImporting XML into InDesign
 singulars
 PostTypePostTypeId
 PTQuestion
PostTypePostTypeId
1. PTAnswer
UserLastEditorUserId
1. USPeter Krauss
UserOwnerUserId
1. USPeter Krauss
plurals
PostLinksPostIdRelatedPostId
1. This table or related slice is empty.
PostLinksRelatedPostIdPostId
1. This table or related slice is empty.
PostsAcceptedAnswerId
1. This table or related slice is empty.
PostsParentIdCreationDate
1. This table or related slice is empty.
VotesPostIdCreationDate
1. VO
 singulars
 PostPostId
 PO
 UserUserId
 This table or related slice is empty.
 VoteTypeVoteTypeId
 VTUpMod
CommentsPostId
1. This table or related slice is empty.

Querying!

Guidance

A row detail

Detail views are divided into sections. All the information in the data section comes from columns in the selected row. The other sections display data from other, related rows.

Related data can be related in a to-one or a to-many fashion. Captions of data related in a to-many fashion link to a list view showing a filtered view of the table.

Try moving around until you find a non-empty to-many entry and click on the label to get to one. You can move back to the root by clicking on the database name in the header.