StackOverflow2013

Note that there are some explanatory texts on larger screens.

plurals

PO
primarykey
Id
15534267
data
AcceptedAnswerId
0
AnswerCount
0
ClosedDate
CommentCount
0
CommunityOwnedDate
CreationDate
2013-03-20T20:41:04.643
FavoriteCount
0
LastActivityDate
2013-03-20T21:01:20.150
LastEditDate
2013-03-20T21:01:20.150
LastEditorUserId
2186573
OwnerUserId
2186573
ParentId
15501493
PostTypeId
2
Score
3
ViewCount
0
LastEditorDisplayName
text
Body
That's all true what you said and it actually takes place in my issue. But I also found the the root cause: One of main assumptions during design was to allow both anonymous users to use the chat without need to sign-in and the back-end users (agents) to sign-in to restricted area of chat using their Windows credentials. So on the IIS manager I enabled both Anonymous authentication (allowing anonymous users to use the chat) and the Windows authentication (allowing agents to access using their Windows credentials). MVC application is configured to use Windows authentication - the <code>[Authorize]</code> attribute mentioned in question, but only to restrict access for agent's view of chat. What actually happens with above configuration is: 1. When client (agent) requests restricted View (let's say it's <code>/Chat/Agent</code>) the <code>[Authorize]</code> attribute initializes authentication (Windows) 2. Client-side Javascript requests <code>Negotiate</code>, what generates <code>connectionId</code> and binds it with client's Windows <code>Identity</code> 3. Here is the tricky part: Because Hub not uses any authentication explicitly, calling <code>send</code> method does not result in any authentication request - IIS Anonymous authentication takes precedency before Windows authentication, and <code>send</code> request is sent with anonymous <code>Identity</code> - but in Hub actual <code>connectionId</code> is related to <code>Identity</code> passed in point 2. This scenario leads to situation you described - <code>connect</code> is called with different <code>Identity</code> than <code>send</code> and Hub returns <code>The connection id is in the incorrect format.</code> 
Tags
Title
singulars
PostAcceptedAnswerId
1. This table or related slice is empty.
PostParentId
1. POSignalR - The connection id is in the incorrect format when using Windows and Anonymous authentication
 singulars
 PostTypePostTypeId
 PTQuestion
PostTypePostTypeId
1. PTAnswer
UserLastEditorUserId
1. USmskuza
UserOwnerUserId
1. USmskuza
plurals
PostLinksPostIdRelatedPostId
1. This table or related slice is empty.
PostLinksRelatedPostIdPostId
1. This table or related slice is empty.
PostsAcceptedAnswerId
1. This table or related slice is empty.
PostsParentIdCreationDate
1. This table or related slice is empty.
VotesPostIdCreationDate
1. VO
 singulars
 PostPostId
 PO
 UserUserId
 This table or related slice is empty.
 VoteTypeVoteTypeId
 VTUpMod
2. VO
 singulars
 PostPostId
 PO
 UserUserId
 This table or related slice is empty.
 VoteTypeVoteTypeId
 VTUpMod
CommentsPostId
1. This table or related slice is empty.

Querying!

Guidance

A row detail

Detail views are divided into sections. All the information in the data section comes from columns in the selected row. The other sections display data from other, related rows.

Related data can be related in a to-one or a to-many fashion. Captions of data related in a to-many fashion link to a list view showing a filtered view of the table.

Try moving around until you find a non-empty to-many entry and click on the label to get to one. You can move back to the root by clicking on the database name in the header.