Note that there are some explanatory texts on larger screens.

plurals
  1. PO
    primarykey
    data
    text
    <p>It depends on the unit of your timeseries. Often we think of this as just "amplitude", but if your timeseries is a series of voltage amplitude vs. time, then your PSD estimate will be <code>Volts^2/Hz</code>. This is because the PSD is the Fourier Transform of the autocorrelation of your original signal: The autocorrelation has units of <code>Volts^2</code>, and running it through the Fourier Transform decomposes these units over frequency, instead of time, resulting in units of <code>Volts^2/Hz</code>. This is commonly referred to as <code>Watts/Hz</code>, but the conversion from <code>Volts^2</code> to <code>Watts</code> is not very physically meaningful, as <code>W = V^2/R</code>.</p> <p><code>10*log10(power)</code> will result in a unit of <code>dB/Hz</code>, but remember that decibels are always a comparison between two power levels; you are quantifying a ratio of powers. A better definition of decibels is <code>10*log10(P1/P0)</code>, <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Decibel#Power_quantities">as explained here</a>. If you simply plug a PSD bin estimate into this equation, you are setting your PSD bin to <code>P1</code> and implicitly comparing it to a <code>P0</code> value of 1. This may be what you want, and it may not be. For visualization purposes, this is fairly typical, but if you have a standard reference power you should be comparing to, you should use that for <code>P0</code> instead.</p> <p>Assuming that you are attempting to plot a dB Power Spectral Density estimate, to convert from <code>Hz</code> to <code>MHz</code>, you simple rescale the x-axis of your frequency graph. Remember that a MHz is just 1 million Hz, so the only difference is that <code>240000Hz</code> = <code>0.24MHz</code></p> <p><strong>EDIT</strong> The point brought up by mtrw is a very valid one; if you are dealing with large amounts of data and are averaging FFT vectors, I highly suggest the <a href="http://www.mathworks.com/help/signal/ref/pmtm.html">Multitaper method</a>; it's a much more statistically sound method of sacrificing frequency resolution for greater confidence on your PSD estimate.</p>
    singulars
    1. This table or related slice is empty.
    plurals
    1. This table or related slice is empty.
    1. This table or related slice is empty.
    1. This table or related slice is empty.
    1. This table or related slice is empty.
    1. VO
      singulars
      1. This table or related slice is empty.
 

Querying!

 
Guidance

SQuiL has stopped working due to an internal error.

If you are curious you may find further information in the browser console, which is accessible through the devtools (F12).

Reload