Databases
StackOverflow2013
Postsdbo
PO
 

Note that there are some explanatory texts on larger screens.

plurals
  1. PO
    primarykey
    data
    text
    <pre><code>$ awk '{printf "%s%s",($1 ~ "/" ? rs : ""),$0; rs=RS} END{print ""}' file 2012/11/01 field1 field2 field3 field4 field5 field6 field7 2012/11/03 field1 field2 field3 2012/12/31 field1 field2 field3 field4 field5 field6 field7 field8 field9 field10 field11 field12 field13 2013/01/10 field1 field2 field3 2013/01/11 field1 field2 field3 field4 </code></pre> <p>Now that I've noticed you don't actually want to just print recombined records, here's an alternative way to do that that's more amenable to test on the recompiled record ("s" in this script:</p> <pre><code>$ awk 'NR&gt;1 &amp;&amp; $1~"/"{print s; s=""} {s=s $0} END{print s}' file </code></pre> <p>Now with that structure, instead of just printing s you can perform tests on s, for example (note "foo" in 3rd record):</p> <pre><code>$ cat file 2012/11/01 field1 field2 field3 field4 fi eld5 field6 field7 2012/11/03 field1 field2 field3 2012/12/31 field1 field2 foo field4 fi eld5 field6 field7 field8 field9 field10 field11 field12 field13 2013/01/10 field1 field2 field3 2013/01/11 field1 field2 field3 field4 $ awk ' function tst(rec, flds,nf,i) { nf=split(rec,flds) if (rec ~ "foo") { print rec for (i=1;i&lt;=nf;i++) print "\t",i,flds[i] } } NR&gt;1 &amp;&amp; $1~"/" { tst(s); s="" } { s=s $0 } END { tst(s) } ' file 2012/12/31 field1 field2 foo field4 field5 field6 field7 field8 field9 field10 field11 field12 field13 1 2012/12/31 2 field1 3 field2 4 foo 5 field4 6 field5 7 field6 8 field7 9 field8 10 field9 11 field10 12 field11 13 field12 14 field13 </code></pre>
    singulars
    1. This table or related slice is empty.
    1. POCombine split lines with awk / gawk
      singulars
      1. PTQuestion
    1. PTAnswer
    1. USEd Morton
    1. USEd Morton
    plurals
    1. This table or related slice is empty.
    1. This table or related slice is empty.
    1. POCombine split lines with awk / gawk
      singulars
      1. PTQuestion
    1. This table or related slice is empty.
    1. VO
      singulars
      1. PO
      1. This table or related slice is empty.
      1. VTUpMod
    2. VO
      singulars
      1. PO
      1. This table or related slice is empty.
      1. VTAcceptedByOriginator
    3. VO
      singulars
      1. PO
      1. This table or related slice is empty.
      1. VTUpMod
    1. COBrilliant. I knew when reading through all the gawk commands and examples that there would likely be this coldly efficient one-liner that did exactly what I needed (to combine the lines) without all kinds of tests and conditions. You nailed that one. And yes, your second example looks like what I will need to process the records. One concern I have is that some of the records are 700 chars wide with 125+ fields. I wonder if `split` can handle that many.
      singulars
      1. PO
      1. USDave Nicks
    2. COwon't be a problem.
      singulars
      1. PO
      1. USEd Morton
 

Querying!

 
Guidance
A row detail

Detail views are divided into sections. All the information in the data section comes from columns in the selected row. The other sections display data from other, related rows.

Related data can be related in a to-one or a to-many fashion. Captions of data related in a to-many fashion link to a list view showing a filtered view of the table.

Try moving around until you find a non-empty to-many entry and click on the label to get to one. You can move back to the root by clicking on the database name in the header.

SQuiL has stopped working due to an internal error.

If you are curious you may find further information in the browser console, which is accessible through the devtools (F12).

Reload