Databases
StackOverflow2013
Postsdbo
PO
 

Note that there are some explanatory texts on larger screens.

plurals
  1. PO
    primarykey
    data
    text
    <p>The choice of identifiers is part of the explanation of REST. <a href="http://www.infoq.com/articles/rest-introduction" rel="nofollow">http://www.infoq.com/articles/rest-introduction</a> </p> <p>Inspect closely the first principle (for <strong>convention</strong>), though it is in broader terms of resources rather than specific to org/biz/brand. <a href="http://www.ics.uci.edu/~fielding/pubs/dissertation/rest_arch_style.htm" rel="nofollow">REST</a> is the thesis that started this trend. Microformats accordingly makes use of <code>rel="profile"</code> link tags. The concept is further expanded at <a href="http://purl.org/" rel="nofollow">http://purl.org/</a> so, if IMDB, for example, switches to W3 like W3C did, then in the future this will minimize the impact on the application you're making right now. RDFa Dublin Core vocab's use of this is seen in the profile at <a href="http://www.w3.org/2011/rdfa-context/rdfa-1.1.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.w3.org/2011/rdfa-context/rdfa-1.1.html</a>.</p> <p>(For <strong>references</strong>) Applications serving general public or open initiatives such as academic support might be better served by these profiles, however when operating a site for commercial purposes, building application-specific "custom" profiles considering various legal matters identified, that should perform reliably with PURLs, might be advantageous to build credible reputation.</p> <p>Finally, WHATWG considers prefixes too advanced and HTML5 for newbies only, so the support for W3's XHTML xmlns/RDFa prefix is dropped in microdata. This compels us to reuse long-form URLs for schema.org business/org/brand resources with microdata syntax. The "custom" profile then serves as mere good-will when picking up from where tasks are wrapped up, otherwise a more variety of items might appear in the content than actually intended, owing to mix-ups.</p> <p>The good news is, Google supports schema.org usage as a vocab in RDFa syntax. So considering RDFa as an already "living" standard that originated in W3 spec, as per the (non-)commercial nature of application, defining PURL for scope namespaces, profiles exhibiting prefixes, and syntax (of <strong>official web-page</strong> or substitute <strong>IRI</strong>s) as per target processors is the way to go. Currently no vocab besides schema is processed as microdata, and schema in RDFa isn't supported by anybody but Google!</p>
    singulars
    1. This table or related slice is empty.
    1. POMicrodata - itemid / global identifier conventions for organizations, business or brands markup with schema.org
      singulars
      1. PTQuestion
    1. PTAnswer
    1. USchharvey
    1. USChawathe Vipul
    plurals
    1. This table or related slice is empty.
    1. This table or related slice is empty.
    1. This table or related slice is empty.
    1. This table or related slice is empty.
    1. This table or related slice is empty.
    1. This table or related slice is empty.
 

Querying!

 
Guidance
A row detail

Detail views are divided into sections. All the information in the data section comes from columns in the selected row. The other sections display data from other, related rows.

Related data can be related in a to-one or a to-many fashion. Captions of data related in a to-many fashion link to a list view showing a filtered view of the table.

Try moving around until you find a non-empty to-many entry and click on the label to get to one. You can move back to the root by clicking on the database name in the header.

SQuiL has stopped working due to an internal error.

If you are curious you may find further information in the browser console, which is accessible through the devtools (F12).

Reload