Note that there are some explanatory texts on larger screens.

plurals
  1. PO
    primarykey
    data
    text
    <p>Vocabularies are usually domain specific. The xmlns line is deprecated. The RDFa profile at <a href="http://www.w3.org/profile/rdfa-1.1" rel="nofollow">http://www.w3.org/profile/rdfa-1.1</a> lists the vocabularies available as part of initial context. Sometimes vocabularies may overlap in the context of your data. Analogous to solving math prb by either Algebraic or Geometric or other technique, mixing up vocabularies is fine. Equal terms can be found using <a href="http://sameas.org/" rel="nofollow">http://sameas.org/</a> For addressing your consumer base's favoritism amongst vocab recognition, skos:closeMatch and skos:exactMatch may be used, eg. "gr:Brand skos:closeMatch owl:Thing" with any terms you please. Prefix attribute can be used with vocabularies besides those covered by initial context like: prefix="fb: <a href="http://ogp.me/ns/fb#" rel="nofollow">http://ogp.me/ns/fb#</a> vocab2: path2 ..." For cross-cutting concern across different domain vocabularies such as customizing presentation in search results microdata using schema.org guidelines should be beneficial. However, as this has nothing to do with specialization in any peculiar domain, prefixes are unavailable in this syntax. RDFa vocab have been helpful in such specific domain contexts that content seems to appeal further to participative audience while microdata targets those who've lost their way. For tasks that are too simple to merit full-fledged vocab, but have semantic implications, try <a href="http://microformats.org/" rel="nofollow">http://microformats.org/</a> Interchanging usage of REST profile URIs for vocabs amongst the 3 syntaxes is valid, but useless owing to lack of affordable manpower to implement alternative support for the vocabs on the Web scale. How &amp; why schema.org vocab merited separate microdata syntax of its own is discussed by Google employee Ian Hickson a. k. a. Hixie- the editor of WHATWG HTML5 draft at <a href="http://logbot.glob.com.au/?c=freenode%23whatwg&amp;s=28+Nov+2012&amp;e=28+Nov+2012#c747855" rel="nofollow">http://logbot.glob.com.au/?c=freenode%23whatwg&amp;s=28+Nov+2012&amp;e=28+Nov+2012#c747855</a> or <a href="http://krijnhoetmer.nl/irc-logs/whatwg/20121128#l-1122" rel="nofollow">http://krijnhoetmer.nl/irc-logs/whatwg/20121128#l-1122</a> If only Google had smart enough employees to implement parser for 1 syntax whose WG included its own employee also, then RDFa Lite inside RDFa would have been another course like Core Java within Java, &amp; no need of separate microdata named mocking rip-off, but alas- our's is an imperfect world!</p>
    singulars
    1. This table or related slice is empty.
    plurals
    1. This table or related slice is empty.
    1. This table or related slice is empty.
    1. This table or related slice is empty.
    1. This table or related slice is empty.
    1. This table or related slice is empty.
 

Querying!

 
Guidance

SQuiL has stopped working due to an internal error.

If you are curious you may find further information in the browser console, which is accessible through the devtools (F12).

Reload