Databases
StackOverflow2013
Postsdbo
PO
 

Note that there are some explanatory texts on larger screens.

plurals
  1. PO
    primarykey
    data
    text
    <p>C# has the following access.</p> <ul> <li><code>public</code> - everyone can see it</li> <li><code>private</code> - only things inside the class can see it</li> <li><code>protected</code> - only things inside the class, or inside derived classes can see it</li> <li><code>internal</code> - only things inside the assembly (dll or exe) can see it</li> <li><code>protected internal</code> - only things inside the class or derived classes can see it, and only if they are in the same assembly</li> </ul> <p>You have only 2 options:</p> <ul> <li>As <a href="https://stackoverflow.com/questions/1324629/c-class-namespace-access/1324655#1324655">Neil mentioned</a>, you can use <code>internal</code>, and split your code up into 2 assemblies - one for John and one for Paul.</li> <li>As you have already mentioned, you can use <code>private</code>, and nest all the JohnSecret classes inside the outer John class. <a href="https://stackoverflow.com/questions/1324629/c-class-namespace-access/1324687#1324687">paracycle's tip of using partial classes</a> makes this reasonably nice.</li> </ul> <p>Note: to make multiple assemblies you must make multiple projects inside visual studio.</p> <hr> <p>From a pragmatic point of view, does it really matter if the directories are fenced off from each other like that? There are no security benefits in using access modifiers as anyone can always use reflection to easily call your private/internal methods anyway.</p> <p>The main benefit it gives you is keeping clutter out of your way when coding, but you've already put them in different namespaces, which should help with clutter anyway.</p>
    singulars
    1. This table or related slice is empty.
    1. POC# class/namespace Access
      singulars
      1. PTQuestion
    1. PTAnswer
    1. USCommunity
    1. USOrion Edwards
    plurals
    1. This table or related slice is empty.
    1. This table or related slice is empty.
    1. This table or related slice is empty.
    1. This table or related slice is empty.
    1. VO
      singulars
      1. PO
      1. This table or related slice is empty.
      1. VTUpMod
    1. COI tested the partial classes the way "paracycle" said and it's working fine. About the reflection aspect you talked about: I used the tool "Red Gate's .NET Reflector" and yes, I can see all my private classes and core. I am also able to Disassemble. and I can see the code .... :S This showed me that there isn't a way to protect our code? How can I sell a program and do not allow a smartguy to clone my code?
      singulars
      1. PO
      1. USDryadwoods
    2. COActually, `protected internal` is `protected` *or* `internal`, so it is visible to anything in the same assembly, the class itself and its derived classes, regardless of which assembly they are in.
      singulars
      1. PO
      1. USBojan Resnik
 

Querying!

 
Guidance
A row detail

Detail views are divided into sections. All the information in the data section comes from columns in the selected row. The other sections display data from other, related rows.

Related data can be related in a to-one or a to-many fashion. Captions of data related in a to-many fashion link to a list view showing a filtered view of the table.

Try moving around until you find a non-empty to-many entry and click on the label to get to one. You can move back to the root by clicking on the database name in the header.

SQuiL has stopped working due to an internal error.

If you are curious you may find further information in the browser console, which is accessible through the devtools (F12).

Reload