Databases
StackOverflow2013
Postsdbo
POC# class/namespace Access
 

Note that there are some explanatory texts on larger screens.

plurals
  1. POC# class/namespace Access
    primarykey
    data
    text
    <p>I asked this question to multiple people and until now I do not have an answer.</p> <p>ASP.NET C#</p> <p>Project tree (files and folders):</p> <pre><code>&gt; (ROOT) &gt; &gt; Class MyAccess (namespace myproject.core) &gt; &gt; (Directory John) ------&gt; Class MyJohn (namespace myproject.core.John) ------&gt; Class JohnSecret (namespace myproject.core.John) ------&gt; Class OtherJohnSecret (namespace myproject.core.John) &gt; &gt; (Directory Paul) ------&gt; Class MyPaul (namespace myproject.core.Paul) ------&gt; Class PaulSecret (namespace myproject.core.Paul) </code></pre> <p>How can I use (public, private, protected, internal) ????? to have have this behavior:</p> <ul> <li>class MyJohn sees and can create objects from all the classes inside John folder (all his secrets)</li> <li>class MyPaul have the same behavior but inside Paul folder</li> <li>All this secrets CAN NOT be used OUTSIDE this folders.</li> </ul> <p>Examples:</p> <ul> <li>MyPaul can use all his secrets, and he can communicate with the classes MyAccess and with MyJohn.</li> <li>MyPaul, MyJohn, MyAccess will be public or internal </li> <li>MyAccess can not use PaulSecret. </li> </ul> <hr> <p><strong>Solutions that I do not like:</strong></p> <ul> <li><strong>BAD Solution 1</strong></li> </ul> <p>Make John secrets as protected and heritage one MyJohn </p> <p>Example:</p> <pre><code>&gt; protected JohnSecret &gt; internal MyJohn:JohnSecret </code></pre> <p>bad because if i've 100 class secrets I'll need to have something like:</p> <pre><code>&gt; internal MyJohn:JohnSecret1, JohnSecret2,....,JohnSecret100 </code></pre> <ul> <li><strong>BAD Solution 2</strong></li> </ul> <p>Have classes inside classes:</p> <pre><code>&gt; internal class MyJohn { &gt; &gt; internal string DoSomething(){} &gt; &gt; private class JohnSecret{} &gt; private class JohnSecret2{} &gt; private class JohnSecret3{} &gt; &gt; } </code></pre> <p>It's not good because, once again, if I've 100 secrets I'll have a HUGE file, I can't split that code in different source code files.</p> <hr> <p>Can anyone give a good solution?</p> <p>I appreciate :)</p> <p>Thanks a lot.</p>
    singulars
    1. PO
      singulars
      1. PTAnswer
    1. This table or related slice is empty.
    1. PTQuestion
    1. USDryadwoods
    1. USDryadwoods
    plurals
    1. This table or related slice is empty.
    1. This table or related slice is empty.
    1. This table or related slice is empty.
    1. PO
      singulars
      1. PTAnswer
    2. PO
      singulars
      1. PTAnswer
    1. VO
      singulars
      1. POC# class/namespace Access
      1. This table or related slice is empty.
      1. VTUpMod
    1. COWhy do you need so many secret classes?
      singulars
      1. POC# class/namespace Access
      1. USJared314
    2. COIf you have such complex situations with access modifiers, I guess there must be something other wrong in your situation.
      singulars
      1. POC# class/namespace Access
      1. USJuri
    3. COThis question came when we've code that will be developed by a team (multiple people coding -> CVS control) and sometimes with the Visual Studio's IntelliSense we can access one class (in some other code directory) that should not be used directly. This is why I asked how can we avoid this.
      singulars
      1. POC# class/namespace Access
      1. USDryadwoods
 

Querying!

 
Guidance
A row detail

Detail views are divided into sections. All the information in the data section comes from columns in the selected row. The other sections display data from other, related rows.

Related data can be related in a to-one or a to-many fashion. Captions of data related in a to-many fashion link to a list view showing a filtered view of the table.

Try moving around until you find a non-empty to-many entry and click on the label to get to one. You can move back to the root by clicking on the database name in the header.

SQuiL has stopped working due to an internal error.

If you are curious you may find further information in the browser console, which is accessible through the devtools (F12).

Reload