Databases
StackOverflow2013
Postsdbo
PO
 

Note that there are some explanatory texts on larger screens.

plurals
  1. PO
    primarykey
    data
    text
    <p>NOTE: This is mostly a compilation of my thoughts and observations on the subject. I'm a C# programmer by day and Python by night.</p> <p>Yeah I agree with some of the stuff that has been said, but I have some time and feel like elaborating and sharing my thoughts. </p> <p>F# is a functional language. Which means you are really more concerned with the verbs so to speak. It is still statically typed and runs on the CLR, but you structure your code differently and work through problems differently. Usually people think that functional languages are more mathematical in structure and easier to prove formally. Of course that is generally regarded as mostly academic.</p> <p>C# and other statically typed OO languages are really more focused on the nouns to further my analogy. So you structure your code and work through problems in regards to that. Of course there are also natural problems with maintaining state and having non-deterministic methods on objects that tend to come up more often in OO languages.</p> <p>And of course F# has some features and ideas borrowed from OO languages while C# has ideas and features borrowed from functional.</p> <p>Comparing Python and C# is more about the difference between dynamic and static typing (although python does offer some functional features that C# still does not). Dynamic typing usually being far easier to handle introspection/reflection activities and run-time modification while adding the risk of run-time errors due to typos or incorrect objects used in "regular" code. </p> <p>Static languages usually have some developer overhead that dynamic languages do not have. The overhead seems to usually be due to having to create layers to abstract things away and creating inheritance hierarchies and interfaces to work with the needed/wanted abstraction. Since you are trying to avoid dependencies to types.</p> <p>It seems like statics languages can be much easier to manage in larger teams. Plus you get the advantages of refactoring very easily with all the checking and tools out there.</p>
    singulars
    1. This table or related slice is empty.
    1. POis F# to IronPython/IronRuby as C# is to VB.NET?
      singulars
      1. PTQuestion
    1. PTAnswer
    1. This table or related slice is empty.
    1. USSean Copenhaver
    plurals
    1. This table or related slice is empty.
    1. This table or related slice is empty.
    1. This table or related slice is empty.
    1. This table or related slice is empty.
    1. VO
      singulars
      1. PO
      1. This table or related slice is empty.
      1. VTUpMod
    2. VO
      singulars
      1. PO
      1. This table or related slice is empty.
      1. VTDownMod
    1. CONice thoughts. I am working on some Python projects that are growing pretty large and the lack of automated refactoring definitely creates extra work.
      singulars
      1. PO
      1. USgravitation
 

Querying!

 
Guidance
A row detail

Detail views are divided into sections. All the information in the data section comes from columns in the selected row. The other sections display data from other, related rows.

Related data can be related in a to-one or a to-many fashion. Captions of data related in a to-many fashion link to a list view showing a filtered view of the table.

Try moving around until you find a non-empty to-many entry and click on the label to get to one. You can move back to the root by clicking on the database name in the header.

SQuiL has stopped working due to an internal error.

If you are curious you may find further information in the browser console, which is accessible through the devtools (F12).

Reload