StackOverflow2013

Note that there are some explanatory texts on larger screens.

plurals

PO
primarykey
Id
12305620
data
AcceptedAnswerId
0
AnswerCount
0
ClosedDate
CommentCount
1
CommunityOwnedDate
CreationDate
2012-09-06T17:46:47.813
FavoriteCount
0
LastActivityDate
2012-09-06T17:46:47.813
LastEditDate
LastEditorUserId
0
OwnerUserId
1424877
ParentId
3719675
PostTypeId
2
Score
1
ViewCount
0
LastEditorDisplayName
text
Body
Green Hills uses the Edison Design Group front-end, and until very recently (say, MULTI 5.0 or maybe even 5.2) the compiler turned on <code>--implicit_include</code> by default. Here's the <a href="http://www.edg.com/docs/edg_cpp.pdf" rel="nofollow">Edison documentation</a> for that option: <pre><code>--implicit_include --no_implicit_include -B Enable or disable implicit inclusion of source files as a method of finding definitions of template entities to be instantiated. -B is equivalent to --implicit_include. The default behavior is specified by the configuration flag DEFAULT_IMPLICIT_TEMPLATE_INCLUSION_MODE. See the section of this chapter on template instantiation. This option is valid only in C++ mode. </code></pre> Your problem will very likely be fixed if you pass <code>--no_implicit_include</code> on the compiler command line. (If that fails, try <code>-W0,--no_implicit_include</code> or <code>:compiler.args=--no_implicit_include</code>, either of which will pass the option straight through to the front-end without (much) censorship by the driver. Passing <code>--std</code> or <code>--STD</code> might also help; I don't remember.) Implicit inclusion is a terribly stupid idea today, but it was a convenient way to provide template functionality back in the '90s. Today, there are standard and well-known ways of satisfying the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/One_Definition_Rule" rel="nofollow">One Definition Rule</a>, and this "implicit inclusion" hack just gets in the way of law-abiding C++tizens such as yourself. Now go on, ask me about prelinking... :)
Tags
Title
singulars
PostAcceptedAnswerId
1. This table or related slice is empty.
PostParentId
1. POStrange behavior for X.cpp/X.hpp files in Integrity
 singulars
 PostTypePostTypeId
 PTQuestion
PostTypePostTypeId
1. PTAnswer
UserLastEditorUserId
1. This table or related slice is empty.
UserOwnerUserId
1. USQuuxplusone
plurals
PostLinksPostIdRelatedPostId
1. This table or related slice is empty.
PostLinksRelatedPostIdPostId
1. This table or related slice is empty.
PostsAcceptedAnswerId
1. POStrange behavior for X.cpp/X.hpp files in Integrity
 singulars
 PostTypePostTypeId
 PTQuestion
PostsParentIdCreationDate
1. This table or related slice is empty.
VotesPostIdCreationDate
1. VO
 singulars
 PostPostId
 PO
 UserUserId
 This table or related slice is empty.
 VoteTypeVoteTypeId
 VTAcceptedByOriginator
2. VO
 singulars
 PostPostId
 PO
 UserUserId
 This table or related slice is empty.
 VoteTypeVoteTypeId
 VTUpMod
CommentsPostId
1. COMan, after more than 2 years you nailed it. How could I ever guess this insanity... Thanks a ton!
 singulars
 PostPostId
 PO
 UserUserId
 USElazar Leibovich

Querying!

Guidance

A row detail

Detail views are divided into sections. All the information in the data section comes from columns in the selected row. The other sections display data from other, related rows.

Related data can be related in a to-one or a to-many fashion. Captions of data related in a to-many fashion link to a list view showing a filtered view of the table.

Try moving around until you find a non-empty to-many entry and click on the label to get to one. You can move back to the root by clicking on the database name in the header.