Note that there are some explanatory texts on larger screens.

plurals
  1. POPrevent pandas from automatically inferring type in read_csv
    primarykey
    data
    text
    singulars
    1. This table or related slice is empty.
    plurals
    1. This table or related slice is empty.
    1. This table or related slice is empty.
    1. This table or related slice is empty.
    1. COIt may not be avoidable. Pandas (and NumPy more generally) doesn't support NaN for integers. Since reading from any CSV leaves the possibility for NaN, it might have been a convenience choice to just have it coerce to float always. Also, your types seem backwards from your printout. It surely *won't* convert floatlike input to an int64, though it presumably *will* convert intlike input to float64.
      singulars
    2. COI don't believe the order of dtypes listed have anything to do with the order of the columns, but with regard to automatic type coercion, this would be most unfortunate. I was under the impression pandas used NaN anytime information was missing, regardless of type.
      singulars
    3. COYes, it does, but then that column will always be of type Object. You can have an Object column that's mostly Ints. However, there are many cases where the NaN coerces it into a float column instead. If you first make an object column and then fill it with possibly-NaN integers, it will stay as object. I think if you just fill it with whatever's there, leaving Pandas to discern the type, it will choose float for any numeric type than has NaNs present. This is not just a limitation of Pandas, but of NumPy and Python entirely. There is no library I'm aware of offering an Int with NaN support.
      singulars
 

Querying!

 
Guidance

SQuiL has stopped working due to an internal error.

If you are curious you may find further information in the browser console, which is accessible through the devtools (F12).

Reload