Databases
StackOverflow2013
Postsdbo
PO
 

Note that there are some explanatory texts on larger screens.

plurals
  1. PO
    primarykey
    data
    text
    <blockquote> <p>What are the differences between the two of them, if any? <strong>If there are no differences why the new name?</strong></p> </blockquote> <p>In fact, it is the old name : <code>for</code>. </p> <p>If you meant why C++ doesn't add a new name, such as <code>foreach</code>, to the language like other languages have done, then you tell us why add a <em>new</em> name when old name works fine?</p> <hr> <p>From your comment:</p> <blockquote> <p>But to my knowledge all others call this type of syntax a "for-each loop". The new name for the concept had me asking if there is indeed more differences than I can see.</p> </blockquote> <p>Alright. It is about the terminologies : <em>for-each-loop</em> vs. <em>range-based-for-loop</em>.</p> <p>I think it is because C++ range-based-for-loop basically iterates <em>all elements in the range</em> defined by <em>std::begin(c)</em> and <em>std::end(c)</em>. In other words, the name <em>range-based-for-loop</em> emphasizes the philosophy of <code>begin</code> and <code>end</code> iterators which define the <em>range</em>. </p> <p>To explain that further, range-based-for-loop would work only for those collection for which <code>begin()</code> and <code>end()</code> are defined:</p> <pre><code>std::vector&lt;int&gt; v; int a[100]; int *p = new int[100]; for(int i : v) {} // works : begin(v) and end(v) are defined for(int i : a) {} // works : begin(a) and end(a) are defined for(int i : p) {} // does not work : begin(p) and end(p) are not defined </code></pre> <p>Hope that helps.</p>
    singulars
    1. This table or related slice is empty.
    1. POHow is the range-based loop different to a for-each loop?
      singulars
      1. PTQuestion
    1. PTAnswer
    1. USNawaz
    1. USNawaz
    plurals
    1. This table or related slice is empty.
    1. This table or related slice is empty.
    1. This table or related slice is empty.
    1. This table or related slice is empty.
    1. VO
      singulars
      1. PO
      1. This table or related slice is empty.
      1. VTUpMod
    2. VO
      singulars
      1. PO
      1. This table or related slice is empty.
      1. VTUpMod
    3. VO
      singulars
      1. PO
      1. This table or related slice is empty.
      1. VTUpMod
    1. COI'm not actually calling for introducing a new keyword `foreach` or such. `for (something : somethings)` works fine. Not all other languages use a `foreach` keyword. But to my knowledge all others call this type of syntax a "for-each loop". The new name for the concept had me asking if there is indeed more differences than I can see.
      singulars
      1. PO
      1. UScharisis
    2. CO@charisis: Updated my answer.
      singulars
      1. PO
      1. USNawaz
    3. CO@Nawaz: liked your explanation & example for calling it a range-based-for-loop
      singulars
      1. PO
      1. USsri
 

Querying!

 
Guidance
A row detail

Detail views are divided into sections. All the information in the data section comes from columns in the selected row. The other sections display data from other, related rows.

Related data can be related in a to-one or a to-many fashion. Captions of data related in a to-many fashion link to a list view showing a filtered view of the table.

Try moving around until you find a non-empty to-many entry and click on the label to get to one. You can move back to the root by clicking on the database name in the header.

SQuiL has stopped working due to an internal error.

If you are curious you may find further information in the browser console, which is accessible through the devtools (F12).

Reload