Note that there are some explanatory texts on larger screens.

plurals
  1. POIs mootools alternative of jquery + backbone / spine / sprouteCore
    text
    copied!<p>I was full time java developers, now I also work on JavaScript. couple of years back when I started learning JavaScript, first library I tried was jquery like most of the people. But it made my life harder, and after sometime I started writing fairly large JavaScript app. It wasn't coming together for me using jquery. I had huge codebase without much of a structure. It was method blocks updating HTML blocks using selectors. Then I tried mootools and obliviously as a java developer it appealed to me a lot. And I was able to write managible web apps having huge code base.</p> <p>As per my understanding Mootools is not considered a preferred way to write JavaScript because it mimic conventional OO over default prototype-based OO language. So now to really understand javascript and desire of walking with the world, i decided to try other approaches, so again I turned back to jquery, and realise that only jquery is not enough. So started looking at current trending frameworks like backbone, spine, ember.js, sprouteCore. Strangly I found that these frameworks at their core tries to mimic conventional OO like mootools only by having constructors and creating a object of class and reusing this class object to create instance objects. So</p> <ul> <li>Am I missing something? </li> <li>Is mootools way really wrong? </li> <li>Mootools project is very alive and releases new versions/features, but I don't see many people talking about it on Internet, also there are no comparisions vs backbone/spine etc. </li> </ul>
 

Querying!

 
Guidance

SQuiL has stopped working due to an internal error.

If you are curious you may find further information in the browser console, which is accessible through the devtools (F12).

Reload