Note that there are some explanatory texts on larger screens.

plurals
  1. POPatterns for JavaScript security with back-end authorization?
    text
    copied!<p>I'm looking for some good resources, patterns and practices on how to handle basic security needs, such as authorization, in client side JavaScript. </p> <p>I'm building a website with a back-end system running one of the common MVC frameworks. The back-end will handle all of the real security needs: authorization and authentication. The front is going to be built with Backbone.js, jQuery and a few other libraries to facilitate a very rich user experience.</p> <p>Here's an example of one scenario I need to handle:</p> <p>I have a grid of data with a few buttons on top of it. If you select an item in the grid, certain buttons become enabled so you can take that action on the selected item. This functionality is easy to build... </p> <p>Now I need to consider authorization. The back-end server will only render the buttons that the user is allowed to work with. Additionally, the back-end server will check authorization when the user tries to take that action. ... so the back end is covered and the user won't be able to do what they try, if they are not authorized.</p> <p>But what about the JavaScript? If my code is set up with a bunch of jQuery click handlers or other events that enable and disable buttons, how do I handle the buttons not being there? Do I just write a bunch of ugly <code>if</code> statements checking for the existence of the button? Or do I write the JavaScript in a way that lets me only send the JavaScript for the buttons that exist, down to the browser, based on authorization? or ???</p> <p>Now imagine a tree view that may or may not allow drag &amp; drop functionality, based on authorization... and an add/edit form that may or may not exist based on authorization... and all those other complicated authorization needs, with a lot of JavaScript to run those pieces of the front end.</p> <p>I'm looking for resources, patterns and practices to handle these kinds of scenarios, where the back end handles the real authorization but the front end also needs to account for things not being there based on the authorization.</p>
 

Querying!

 
Guidance

SQuiL has stopped working due to an internal error.

If you are curious you may find further information in the browser console, which is accessible through the devtools (F12).

Reload