Note that there are some explanatory texts on larger screens.

plurals
  1. PO
    text
    copied!<p>There are quite a bit of solutions available. I had this exact problem but I don't wanted to write a code and figure out the problem. </p> <p>Initially I was searching for a possibility to mount S3 bucket in the Linux machine, found something interesting:</p> <blockquote> <p>s3fs - <a href="http://code.google.com/p/s3fs/wiki/InstallationNotes" rel="nofollow">http://code.google.com/p/s3fs/wiki/InstallationNotes</a> - this did work for me. It uses FUSE file-system + rsync to sync the files in S3. It kepes a copy of all filenames in the local system &amp; make it look like a FILE/FOLDER.</p> </blockquote> <p>This saves BUNCH of our time + no headache of writing a code for transferring the files. </p> <p>Now, when I was trying to see if there is other options, I found a ruby script which works in CLI, can help you manage S3 account.</p> <blockquote> <p>s3cmd - <a href="http://s3tools.org/s3cmd" rel="nofollow">http://s3tools.org/s3cmd</a> - this looks pretty clear.</p> </blockquote> <p>[UPDATE] Found one more CLI tool - s3sync</p> <blockquote> <p>s3sync - <a href="https://forums.aws.amazon.com/thread.jspa?threadID=11975&amp;start=0&amp;tstart=0" rel="nofollow">https://forums.aws.amazon.com/thread.jspa?threadID=11975&amp;start=0&amp;tstart=0</a> - found in the Amazon AWS community.</p> </blockquote> <p>I don't see both of them different, if you are not worried about the disk-space then I would choose a s3fs than a s3cmd. A disk makes you feel more comfortable + you can see the files in the disk.</p> <p>Hope it helps.</p>
 

Querying!

 
Guidance

SQuiL has stopped working due to an internal error.

If you are curious you may find further information in the browser console, which is accessible through the devtools (F12).

Reload