Note that there are some explanatory texts on larger screens.

plurals
  1. PO
    text
    copied!<p>I've just been doing an evaluation of Activiti vs jBPM.</p> <p>In fact there seems to be very little between the two solutions.</p> <ol> <li>Activiti is Apache V2, jBPM 5.0 is also Apache V2.</li> <li>We're currently using Activiti, but the project is still in dev, so I can't comment on its robustness in production.</li> <li>jBPM is beginning the productization process, so support for 5.x will be available in Q1 2012, see slide 32: <a href="http://www.slideshare.net/krisverlaenen/streamline-your-business-processes-and-enhance-productivity-by-using-jbpm" rel="noreferrer">jBPM demo</a>. jBPM 4 was not supported by Redhat.</li> <li>jBPM 4.x did not support BPMN 2.0, but 5.x does, Activiti does as well. jBPM 5.0 has just been released, which includes support for BPMN 2.0. So now both solutions support BPMN 2.0. </li> <li>I'm not quite sure what you mean by this, but you can do a lot through both APIs</li> <li>Again, not sure what you mean by this, do you mean embedded as part of an application server, in which case, yes for both solutions.</li> </ol> <p>One of our criteria for jBPM was the interaction with Guvnor, and when I downloaded and ran the demo install for jBPM (28/03/2011) and there still seemed to be some major bugs (<a href="https://issues.jboss.org/browse/GUVNOR-1274" rel="noreferrer">GUVNOR-1274</a>), so I personally would test a lot more before I chose to pursue this solution.</p> <p>In fact, we will be recommending one of the above two solutions, but we're not sure which yet, we'll look at it more closely later this year.</p>
 

Querying!

 
Guidance

SQuiL has stopped working due to an internal error.

If you are curious you may find further information in the browser console, which is accessible through the devtools (F12).

Reload