StackOverflow2013

Note that there are some explanatory texts on larger screens.

plurals

POIs this Git workflow acceptable?
text
Body
copied!<p>Git Workflow</p> <ul> <li>Developer 1 (France) - Local Machine - Local Project Files - Local repository </li> <li>Developer 2 (Brasil) - Local Machine - Local Project Files - Local repository</li> <li>Github - Remote Machine - No Files At all - Remote Repository</li> </ul> <p>Both developers, push and pull, by connecting the <em>LOCAL Repository</em> with the <em>REMOTE repository on github</em>.</p> <p>Once we want to upload the project, we do so from ONE of the local machines, trough ftp, to our shared host. </p> <p>Could this be an acceptable work-flow ?</p> <p>Thanks in advance.</p> <p><strong>Update</strong> <br /> So, and if I understood well alexcepoi comment, we can accomplish the above by doing: <br /> <br /> Git Workflow - v2 :)</p> <ul> <li>Developer 1 (France) - Local Machine - Local Project Files - Local repository </li> <li>Developer 2 (Brasil) - Local Machine - Local Project Files - Local repository</li> <li>Github - Remote Machine - No Files At all - Remote Repository</li> <li>Local Machine - No Files at all - Local Repository (from Pull Github Remote Repository).</li> </ul> <p>I'm new, and I'm sure I will mess up on something IF I have, on the same machine, two git clients. (if this is possible), one for development. Another for "pull from github" and upload using ftp.</p> <p>Should we have another machine, and then we ssh to it somehow? So that we can perfectly realise that we ARE NOT messing around?</p> <p>What do you think?</p> <p>Thanks a lot again, and sorry for all those dummy questions. Really. :)</p>

Querying!

Guidance

An individual column

Larger individual text columns get their own page to allow for proper reading.

SQuiL has stopped working due to an internal error.

If you are curious you may find further information in the browser console, which is accessible through the devtools (F12).

Reload