StackOverflow2013

Note that there are some explanatory texts on larger screens.

plurals

POIs JDK "upward" or "backward" compatible?
text
Body
copied!<p><strong>Backward</strong> binary compatibility (or <strong>downward</strong> compatibility) - an ability of clients built with an old version of library API to run on a new one (<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Backward_compatibility" rel="noreferrer">wiki</a>).</p> <p><strong>Upward</strong> binary compatibility (or <strong>forward</strong> compatibility) - an ability of clients built with a new version of library API to run on old one (<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Forward_compatibility" rel="noreferrer">wiki</a>).</p> <p>The general Sun's document about JDK <a href="http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.5.0/compatibility.html" rel="noreferrer">Incompatibilities in J2SE 5.0 since 1.4.2</a> (and <a href="http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/java/javase/compatibility-137541.html" rel="noreferrer">Java SE 6 compatibility with J2SE 5.0</a> too) describes the compatibility of JDK as following:</p> <blockquote> <p>JDK 5.0 is <strong>upwards</strong> binary-compatible with Java 2 SDK, v1.4.2 except for the incompatibilities listed below. This means that, except for the noted incompatibilities, <strong>class files built with version 1.4.2 compilers will run correctly in JDK 5.0</strong>.</p> </blockquote> <p>I suppose that documentation writers have <strong>mixed up</strong> terms "upward" and "backward" compatibility in this sentence. They describe a "backward" compatibility, but call this feature as "upward" compatibility.</p> <p>Is this a typo, mistake or intended term here? Is JDK "upward" or "backward" compatible?</p>

Querying!

Guidance

An individual column

Larger individual text columns get their own page to allow for proper reading.

SQuiL has stopped working due to an internal error.

If you are curious you may find further information in the browser console, which is accessible through the devtools (F12).

Reload