Note that there are some explanatory texts on larger screens.

plurals
  1. PO
    text
    copied!<p>Sounds to me like you are just asking for a design pattern (or set of patterns) that you could use to do this in a generic, future-proof manner, right?</p> <p>Ideally some of the attributes that you probably want</p> <ul> <li>Each "transformer" is decoupled from one another.</li> <li>You can easily add new "transformers" without having to rewrite your main "driver" routine.</li> <li>You don't need to recompile / redeploy your entire solution every time you modify a transformer, or at least add a new one.</li> </ul> <p>Each "transformer" should ideally implement a common interface that your driver routine knows about - call it IXmlTransformer. The responsibility of this interface is to take in an XML file and to return whatever object model / dataset that you use to save to the database. Each of your transformers would implement this interface. For common logic that is shared by all transformers you could either create a based class that all inherit from, or (my preferred choice) have a set of helper methods which you can call from any of them.</p> <p>I would start by using a Factory to create each "transformer" from your main driver routine. The factory could use reflection to interrogate all assemblies it can see that, or something like MEF which could do a lot of the work for you. Your driver logic should use the factory to create all the transformers and store them.</p> <p>Then you need some logic and mechanism to "lookup" each XML file received to a given Transformer - perhaps each XML file has a header that you could use to identify or something similar. Again, you want to keep these decoupled from your main logic so that you can easily add new transformers without modification of the driver routine. You could e.g. supply the XML file to each transformer and ask it "can you transform this file", and it is up to each transformer to "take responsibility" for a given file.</p> <p>Every time your driver routine gets a new XML file, it looks up the appropriate transformer, and runs it through; the result gets sent to the DB processing area. If no transformer can be found, you dump the file in a directory for interrogation later.</p> <p>I would recommend reading a book like Agile Principles, Patterns and Practices by Robert Martin (http://www.amazon.co.uk/Agile-Principles-Patterns-Practices-C/dp/0131857258), which gives good examples of appropriate design patterns for situations like yours e.g. Factory and DIP etc.</p> <p>Hope that helps!</p>
 

Querying!

 
Guidance

SQuiL has stopped working due to an internal error.

If you are curious you may find further information in the browser console, which is accessible through the devtools (F12).

Reload