StackOverflow2013

Note that there are some explanatory texts on larger screens.

plurals

PO
text
Body
copied!<p>I've been playing with git-emacs for a few days. I chose that one after reading about my choices (<a href="http://xtalk.msk.su/~ott/en/writings/emacs-vcs/EmacsGit.html" rel="noreferrer">on your blog post</a>) and trying a few of them out. My thoughts:</p> <ol> <li><p>git.el - two things stood out from your review</p> <ul> <li>it worked like PCL-CVS -- I am familiar with that package (having used it for many years, many years ago) but I was more interested in learning how to do things the git way, and I thought having a familiar paradigm would hinder that learning.</li> <li>the git commands didn't work outside of the status buffer -- I like to integrate at a deeper level than that, otherwise I could just run all of my git commands from the shell and be done with it.</li> </ul></li> <li><p>magit - seemed much better in terms of doing things the git way but, again, two things stood out:</p> <ul> <li>changing semantics -- You mentioned several commands that behaved differently depending on context. Normally I'm a big fan of -dwim commands, but not when the difference is between un-staging a file and deleting it!</li> <li>it didn't look as nice as some of the others (e.g. egg or git-emacs); on the plus side, I did like the graphical branch representations</li> </ul></li> <li><p>egg - I actually tried this one</p> <ul> <li>magit with a better interface, and while it looked much better than magit, I was concerned that it wouldn't keep up with magit development</li> <li>there was next to no documentation on it; I ran into some problem (I can't remember what) and couldn't find out the solution, so I just ditched it and moved on to....</li> </ul></li> <li><p>git-emacs -- looked nice and had nice documentation</p> <ul> <li>things I like: documentation, ease of use, look and feel, lots of useful commands built-in, direct access to any git command via `<strong>git-cmd</strong>', support for git-blame</li> <li>things I dislike: <em>ido</em> (not having it be configurable is a major turn-off to me and hints at an attitude of "I know best" on the part of the author), lack of some basic commands like <em>stash</em>, lack of any customizations (again, hinting at an "I know best" attitude)</li> </ul></li> </ol> <p>As I'm still in my infancy in terms of learning git itself, it's hard to say what else is missing from these packages. I plan on asking the author of git-emacs if he's interested in patches, as I would likely introduce customizations (of ido, faces and other normal things). Hope this helps somewhat, anyway.</p>

Querying!

Guidance

An individual column

Larger individual text columns get their own page to allow for proper reading.

SQuiL has stopped working due to an internal error.

If you are curious you may find further information in the browser console, which is accessible through the devtools (F12).

Reload