Note that there are some explanatory texts on larger screens.

plurals
  1. PO
    text
    copied!<p>I've checked this against the contents of the plain.bst file, rather thanrelying on dimly recalled assertions about what bibtex does, as per the post of mine I deleted... plain.bst treats titles in one of two ways, using the functions it defines, first, format.title, used, e.g., for @article, which lowercases, and then format.btitle, used for @book, which puts the title in emphasis without touching the capitalisation.</p> <p>Rules for capitalising titles are complex, complex enough that one can't expect a .bst file to completely automate it. For example, Chicago Manual of Style says one should "Lowercase prepositions, regardless of length" with a list of examples. But prepositionhood is a semantic role, that is syntactically generative: CMoS gives as an example preposition "according to". And one of the exceptions is to capitalise when the preposition is stressed: e.g., in "Alice Through the Looking Glass", where stress isn't even semantic, but a pragmatic property of the word. So it's not the bst's role.</p> <p>So the Right Thing is to put title strings in title case, protecting the capitalisation of proper names with {}s (e.g., From {B}rouwer to {H}ilbert). Do this with articles too, since some reflist styles, e.g., MLA, put article titles into title case, but most scientif styles lowercase them.</p> <p>plain.bst gets one thing wrong: for @article, it does not consider colons, which are used to indicate subtitles. So protect the capital letter after colons.</p>
 

Querying!

 
Guidance

SQuiL has stopped working due to an internal error.

If you are curious you may find further information in the browser console, which is accessible through the devtools (F12).

Reload