Note that there are some explanatory texts on larger screens.

plurals
  1. POPhoneGap App rejected 10.6
    text
    copied!<p>Our PhoneGap App just got rejected.</p> <p>Binary Rejected:</p> <blockquote> <p>10.6: Apple and our customers place a high value on simple, refined, creative, well thought through interfaces. They take more work but are worth it. Apple sets a high bar. If your user interface is complex or less than very good it may be rejected</p> </blockquote> <p>Text:</p> <blockquote> <p>"We found the following issues with the user interface of your app:</p> <ul> <li>Did not include iOS features. For example, it would be appropriate to use native iOS buttons and iOS features other than just web views, Push Notifications, or sharing.</li> </ul> <p>Specifically, we noticed the app provides a consumption of information with limited ways users can interact with that information. It would be appropriate to add iOS specific UI and functionality rather than displaying just text and table views."</p> </blockquote> <p>On above they are first referring to the interface and the look and next they are reffering to just the content/function and that the app just provides informations. </p> <p>The Interface is clean and simple. <strong>It is an application that provides (premium) informations. There are several apps in app store who work like this.</strong></p> <p>I heard about including some plugin or API so that I can justify the App. But there would be no sense in this app for the use of an plugin. Or has someone an Idea to provide fake functions?</p> <p>Would be sad if we couldn't release this app, we put a lot of time and effort in this app.</p> <p>Has anyone tips on how to submit an information-based application?</p>
 

Querying!

 
Guidance

SQuiL has stopped working due to an internal error.

If you are curious you may find further information in the browser console, which is accessible through the devtools (F12).

Reload