StackOverflow2013

Note that there are some explanatory texts on larger screens.

plurals

PO
text
Body
copied!<p>No, it is not true. People just use what they prefer most. The definition of IDE is also a bit weak. On Linux, many text editors are very powerful, for example Emacs. You could perhaps call that text editor already an IDE. Though, to point out a difference, Emacs (and other text editors) were originally made to be very general and write just anything with it, and handy tools/functions for developing C/C++/whatever were added later. And their programming language support mostly* only covers syntax highlighting, not much more.</p> <p>Applications like KDevelop or Eclipse were initially developed to be a development environment and most of these still have more/better functionality to develop. I call these IDEs.</p> <p>There are many different IDEs on Linux, some more powerful, some less powerful, some for one specific programming language, some for many different. Depending what language you want to write in, some are better than others.</p> <p>Also, some are more bloated than others. That is one of the main reasons people just use a text editor because it is very snappy, very stable and very fast.</p> <p>I'll list some IDEs which I think are the best in term of functionality specific to that language (like code completion and many other stuff).</p> <p>For C/C++:</p> <ol> <li><p>KDevelop</p> <p>For what I know there is no IDE which has better support for C/C++. I didn't found any other tool which handles C++ in such a way that it really understands STL, which is important that you can use autocompletion for STL containers and such stuff. It even understands macros, so autocompletion even works in very complicated cases with many macro-tricks. I work on a ~250k loc C++ project and it has understood the full code. (To use the extended C/C++ support though, you have to activate it in project settings, it is disabled by default. Also, to have full STL support, I preparsed the STL headers and added that to the C++ support in project settings manually. Don't know if that is still needed. But I guess it still doesn't work out-of-the-box.)</p> <p>Also, KDevelop is very snappy and fast (developed itself in C++), compared to many other IDEs. It loads almost as fast as any other simple text editor and feels as snappy as such. And that also doesn't change for very big projects. Whereby I myself just use it for editing/writing the code, not managing the compiling of the project. It has automake support but I prefer to use CMake. But KDevelop works fine with that: when I press compile in KDevelop, it just starts a make.</p> <p>Initially, KDevelop was developed as a development tool for KDE applications but it works fine for any C/C++ project. I actually have never done any Qt/KDE project with it. Also, support for other languages like Ada were added later on but I haven't tried that.</p> <p>I don't know any other IDE which has better support for C++. Please comment me if I am wrong here. I didn't checked many other IDEs anymore in the last one or two years.</p></li> <li><p>Eclipse</p> <p>You probably know that already. Initially it was developed in and for Java. Later, support for C/C++ was added.</p> <p>I want to note this IDE because I know many people using it. I am not really recommending it though because I have mostly made bad experiences.</p> <p>The C++ support is good, not perfect though; there are cases where autocompletion doesn't work.</p> <p>The possibilities and features of the IDE itself are very rich. I don't know many other IDEs which are such big (bloated). That, together that it is in Java, makes it often feel very slow and sometimes hanging while you are writing something. Also the memory usage is very high.</p></li> <li><p>Qt Creator</p> <p>Initially for Qt development, but also fine for any other C/C++ projects. Very good qmake support.</p> <p>The C++ support is nice, only some smaller problems. Also, the IDE is snappy and fast.</p> <p>After all, I found myself a bit too limited in this IDE and the C++ support in KDevelop was still better, so I kept using KDevelop for most C++ projects. But when you do a Qt project, Qt Creator is great because it also comes with some nice GUI builders for Qt and other nice Qt tools.</p></li> <li><p>CLion</p> <p>(Commercial, but free version.) A newcomer by JetBrains. Very promising.</p></li> </ol> <p>For Java:</p> <ol> <li><p>Eclipse</p> <p>See my comments above.</p> <p>For Java, I think this is the most common IDE on Linux. The same disadvantages as noted above apply here also but I don't know any better IDE, so I keep using Eclipse when I develop in Java.</p></li> <li><p>NetBeans</p> <p>Also in and for Java. Never tried that because it was not really supported in my Linux distribution (I think because of licensing issues, don't remember exactly anymore).</p> <p>I have seen many flames in the past about NetBeans-vs-Eclipse. Don't know actually about the current state.</p></li> </ol> <p>For C#:</p> <ol> <li><p>MonoDevelop</p> <p>Also haven't tried that myself, only have heard that it is one of the best tools for C#. Just wanted to note that because you referred to Visual Studio and you may be interested in C#.</p></li> </ol> <p>I want to add some words to the usage of the terminal:</p> <p>In addition to such an IDE, it is very common to use a terminal in parallel to your IDE. The terminal and all its shells together with all the Unix tools and other tools is very powerfull and you can do many tasks in a very simple way. Once you get a good overview over all the Unix tools and how to use them, they can save you a lot of work.</p> <p>There are often tasks in a project which needs to be done again and again. That can be simple tasks like how you manage your source code and distribute it with your teammates or also more complex tasks.</p> <p>For example, when you do some server-client work and start perhaps 10 servers and 100 clients on different machines, let them all doing something; then grep the output for some regular expressions and collect all that and do some performance tests over 10 seconds and repeat that progress several times - such things are all trivial once you manage the terminal.</p> <p>You will find yourself ending up having just several scripts written which do all that for you. Writing such scripts is mostly straight-forward.</p> <p>This goes perhaps a bit off-topic but I just wanted to have that noted because it is a common and powerfull way to work. When you switched from Windows to Linux as a developer, you should take a look at all those additional possibilities you have now. Those are the main reason for me (and many others) why I prefer developing on Linux/Unix than on any other system.</p> <hr> <p>(*) Again some words to Emacs: Emacs can be extended my many tools and plugins which make it a very rich system with the same functionality as an IDE. For example, there is <a href="http://cedet.sourceforge.net/" rel="nofollow noreferrer">CEDET</a> which comes with real language support, i.e. you also have features like <a href="http://cedet.sourceforge.net/intellisense.shtml" rel="nofollow noreferrer">smart word completion / IntelliSense</a> and also a project management system. I haven't tried it myself but I will do that in the next weeks.</p>

Querying!

Guidance

An individual column

Larger individual text columns get their own page to allow for proper reading.

SQuiL has stopped working due to an internal error.

If you are curious you may find further information in the browser console, which is accessible through the devtools (F12).

Reload