Note that there are some explanatory texts on larger screens.

plurals
  1. PO
    text
    copied!<p>I would go with #2 out of the options you listed above.</p> <ul> <li><h1>1 - The human eye recognizes and comprehends size differences much more effectively than color, when the color scale is along the same spectrum (ie, various blues as opposed to discrete individual colors).</h1></li> <li><h1>3 - Requires the user to scan the full list and mathematically compare each individual number while scanning. No real meaningful relationship between tags without a lot of work on the users part.</h1></li> </ul> <p>So, going with #2, there are several considerations to take into account:</p> <ul> <li>Keep the tags alphabetical. This affords the user another method of searching and establishes a known relationship between each (assuming they know the alphabet!). If they're unordered, it's just a crapshoot to find a single one.</li> <li>If size comparison is absolutely critical (this usually isn't the case, as you can scale up each level by a certain percentage or pixel amount), use a monospaced font. Otherwise, certain letter combinations may end up <strong>looking</strong> larger than they actually are.</li> <li>Don't include any commas, pipes, or other dividers. You're already going to have a lot of data in a small area - no need to clutter it up with debris. Space the tags out with a decent amount of padding, of course. Just don't double the number of visual elements by adding more than just the data.</li> <li>Set a min/max font size and scale between those. There are situations where one tag may be so popular that visually it may appear exponentially larger than the others. Likewise, you don't want a tag to end up rendering at 1px! Set the min/max and adjust between as necessary.</li> </ul>
 

Querying!

 
Guidance

SQuiL has stopped working due to an internal error.

If you are curious you may find further information in the browser console, which is accessible through the devtools (F12).

Reload