Note that there are some explanatory texts on larger screens.

plurals
  1. PO
    text
    copied!<p>I would push you towards standard web development technologies in most cases. Javascript is no longer a great challenge to debug or maintain with good libs like jQuery/Prototype to iron out some of the browser inconsistencies and tools like Firebug and the MS script debugger to help with debugging.</p> <p>There are cases when Flash is a better option, but only in cases where you are doing complex animations. And, if you are willing to invest the effort, most animations can be achieved without resorting to flash. A <a href="http://www.hudsonstreetservices.com/" rel="noreferrer">couple</a> of <a href="http://www.hudsonstreetservices.com/hudsonstreet/services/index.asp" rel="noreferrer">examples</a>...</p> <p><strong>Flash content is not as accessible as other content.</strong><br> This will not only affect people with out flash, but also search engine spiders. There may be some hacks to help get around this now, but I think that most flash content will never be indexed by google.</p> <p><strong>Flash breaks the web UI.</strong><br> For example: </p> <ul> <li>If I click my mouse wheel on a link, that link is opened in a background tab. In a flash app there is no way to simulate this behavior.</li> <li>If I select text in my browser and right-click I get options provided by the browser that include things like "Search Google for this text". In a flash app those options are no longer there.</li> <li>If I right click on a link or an image I get a different set of options that are not available in a flash app. This can be very frustrating to a user who is not "flash savvy".</li> </ul>
 

Querying!

 
Guidance

SQuiL has stopped working due to an internal error.

If you are curious you may find further information in the browser console, which is accessible through the devtools (F12).

Reload