Note that there are some explanatory texts on larger screens.

plurals
  1. POIs OOP abused in universities?
    text
    copied!<p>I started my college two years ago, and since then I keep hearing "design your classes first". I really ask myself sometimes, should my solution to be a bunch of objects in the first place! Some say that you don't see its benefits because your codebase is very small - university projects. The project size excuse just don't go down my throat. If the solution goes well with the project, I believe it should be the right one also with the macro-version of that project.</p> <p>I am not saying OOP is bad, I just feel it is abused in classrooms where students like me are told day and night that OOP is <em>the right way</em>.</p> <p>IMHO, the proper answer shouldn't come from a professor, I prefer to hear it from real engineers in the field.</p> <p><strong>Is OOP the right approach always?</strong></p> <p><strong>When is OOP the best approach?</strong></p> <p><strong>When is OOP a bad approach?</strong></p> <p>This is a very general question. I am not asking for definite answers, just some real design experience from the field.</p> <p>I don't care about performance. I am asking about design. I know it is engineering in real life.</p> <p>==================================================================================</p> <p><strong>Thankful for all contributions. I chose Nosredna answer, because she addressed my questions in general and convinced me that I was wrong about the following : <em>If the solution goes well with the project, I believe it should be the right one also with the macro-version of that project.</em></strong></p>
 

Querying!

 
Guidance

SQuiL has stopped working due to an internal error.

If you are curious you may find further information in the browser console, which is accessible through the devtools (F12).

Reload